Welcome To BallardNewsTribune.com Updated As Warranted

Local News




Map courtesy of the Seattle Department of Transportation




City council eyes streetcar network

Monday, January 28, 2008

City Council members are considering leveraging the success of the South Lake Union Streetcar to build trolleys across the city, including a line that would link West Seattle, downtown and Ballard.

Chair of the council's transportation committee Jan Drago said since initial ridership for the South Lake Union car has been promising, there's drive to build a citywide system.

"I am very pleased with all the energy and ideas that the streetcar network has generated," said Drago. "Now our task is to take the best of all these ideas and combine them into one tangible proposal."

The 2.6-mile passenger rail line, which links South Lake Union to Westlake, opened Dec. 12 and has exceeded the city's expected use. Mayor Greg Nickels Office reported last week the $52 million line has carried more than 100,000 passengers, though nearly 80,000 rode during the first three weeks when service was free.

The transportation committee recently reviewed plans for a citywide system from three separate groups: the Seattle Streetcar Alliance, the Seattle Department of Transportation, and Heffron Transportation, a consultant hired by the council last year.

The preliminary plans attempt to fill in transit gaps in areas of the city that are growing and may not have its needs met by King County Metro bus service alone.

Department of Transportation Director Grace Crunican stressed the network would mostly provide local service and isn't meant to match bus rapid transit routes Ballard and West Seattle are scheduled to get as part of the voter-approved "Transit Now" program.

"Ballard and West Seattle have felt somewhat abandoned after the monorail went away and we've been looking for a way to get transportation there," said Crunican. "This isn't supposed to be the rapid ride. So, it very much makes sense in my mind that you have a rapid ride... and also a streetcar line for the local connection stops."

An early map also shows streetcar service would eventually be added to the International District/First Hill/Capitol Hill, Uptown and Fremont. The existing South Lake Union Streetcar would be extended to Eastlake and the University of Washington.

But which neighborhood gets it first, or needs it the most, is yet to be determined.

Ethan Melone, with the major projects division of the Department of Transportation, said ridership alone would not be the deciding factor.

Funding won't come easy, so the city will have to look at where it can leverage monies from other transit projects that might benefit from streetcar connections, such as Sound Transit Light Rail or the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement. Some extensions may be better financed through Local Improvement Districts, by which a group of property owners share in the cost of transportation infrastructure improvements.

"There's no one way to do this," said Drago. "There's many possible ways and it will be somewhat dependent on what interest there is in potential partners."

A two-part study done for the Alliance by the University of Washington Urban Form Lab found that because revenues from ridership typically meet only a fraction of the financial needs of such systems, about 20 percent, funds tend to come from a combination of private-sector and government entities at the city, state and federal levels.

Melone said the hope is to start one of the lines as early as this year.

"All of (the lines) at this point in time are equal in their potential," he said. "This is a concept to get us started and we think we're poised to move very quickly on this."

James Kelly, a member of the Streetcar Alliance, said the network should provide intra-neighborhood connections and integrate into a larger regional transportation system.

"Seattle is uniquely a city of neighborhood networks, but they are not necessarily connected well," Kelly said. "We believe the streetcar allows us to really connect our communities."

The University of Washington study also explored the social and economic characteristics of neighborhoods that could influence the new rail lines. Dr. Anne Vernez Moudon, who led the study, said there's clear support for expanding Seattle's streetcar network among business owners and public agency staff.

"...When you talk about streetcars everyone wants to see you," said Vernez Moudon, professor of urban design and planning and the University of Washington. "All the doors were open. There's a lot of excitement."

But council member Nick Licata is skeptical that a streetcar network will meet the transit needs in Seattle's urban villages, though he acknowledged it could help expand economic development opportunities here. Less than half of Seattle's 61 transit corridors meet the city's goal of 15-minute service frequency, he said.

"I don't see, right now at least, an analysis of how the streetcar network would allow us to reach those goals in the urban village transit network to get that gap reduced," Licata said. "And if we move forward with the streetcar service, I don't want that gap to grow."

Crunican said those concerns will be addressed in a "work plan," which will be presented to council members Feb. 5. The transportation committee and the full council must approve that plan.

By May 1, the Department of Transportation will present a report to the council that outlines a proposed funding mechanism, potential partners and estimated ridership for each line.

"We're in this process to get a livable, walkable, bikeable, transitable community going and have it easier to take those modes than a car," said Crunican. "This is one tool in that regard."

A citywide streetcar network will be discussed in City Council chambers Tuesday, Feb. 5 at 9:30 a.m., second floor, Seattle City Hall 600 4th Ave. Or watch live on www.seattlechannel.org/ or cable channel 21.

Rebekah Schilperoort may be reached at 782.1244 or rebekahs@robinsonnews.com


Please share your point of view on this story. Comments posted with First and Last names will be considered for publication in the print edition. You may request that your name not be published. You may also send your comment directly to the editor at bnteditor@robinsonnews.com.


Ben wrote on Feb 12, 2008 1:33 PM:

" I absolutely hate when someone says "this mass transit project won't lessen congestion." People that complain about this view mass transit as something to be used by others so that their car commute is more enjoyable. The way that mass transit WILL help your commute is if YOU use it, that way your commute may be shorter and if not you still have more time because you aren't the driver and so you can do something productive during the ride. The reduced stress is also a benefit to many people who don't enjoy their congested commutes. "

Tom: wrote on Feb 3, 2008 9:51 AM:

" The bus is NOT equivalent to a streetcar in its ability to get people on board. The Waterfront line lost 40 percent of its riders when it became a bus, and that in spite of the fare going from $1.25 to $Zip. The bus can't do it. "

Michael wrote on Feb 2, 2008 10:10 AM:

" To answer the question about the Waterfront Streetcar line: it will be operating again in 2009 after the new trolly barn (under construction) is completed. To any naysayers, just look to Portland and how their streetcar has completely revitalized their neighborhoods. "

Kara wrote on Feb 1, 2008 11:29 AM:

" I'm not so sure about this because it just looks like old plans with new twist. They wanted the monorail to do the same thing. And we have the amazing bus #17 and #18 that go from Ballard to West Seattle...how would a streetcar be any faster? I also find it odd that this new shiny version is fine, but the old one wasn't worth the effort...why does Seattle always do everything the wrong way around. "

David Guthrie wrote on Jan 30, 2008 10:28 AM:

" The idea of a City wide "street car" is great! But let us not forget a few important things.
1. The SLUT would not have been built if it wern't for Paul Allen's group Vulcan.
2. The SLUT was a seed line. A line to get things started, and it's a good start. Yes we can continue to joke about it going from Westlake to Hooters.
3. Funding will be difficult unless another large group like Allens suddenly hemorages cash for the thing.
4. It will not and does not releive conjestion, but rather is an economic engine for neighborhood development.
5. We should be looking at future routs to be located not where there are insufficent bus service, but rather where we want to concentrate development that will occure adjacent to it.

Seattle, we can do this!
Now, let's get on board! "

Tim wrote on Jan 29, 2008 7:01 PM:

" For a start, how about resurrecting the downtown-international district streetcar that was killed by the city and SAM because they didn't want to work it into the sculpture park. I find it ironic that after killing off the last streetcar line, it suddenly became a popular idea again with the SLUT.

I'd put money down this will be another monorail fiasco. "

Brad wrote on Jan 29, 2008 9:46 AM:

" That would be awesome if they ran the line from Ballard to W. Seattle! "

(optional)
   
printable version e-mail this story


This Week's Headlines
Stories with Video
WXPort

Ballard
Traffic Cams
85th & Aurora

Sponsored Links