Michael Harthorne
The removal of this monkey puzzle tree Jan. 21 has resulted in fines being issued by the city to the property owners and tree removal company.

City levies fines over removal of Ballard monkey puzzle tree

On Jan. 27 and Jan. 28, the Seattle Department of Planning and Development issued notices of violation to the property owner and tree removal company responsible for removing a monkey puzzle tree from the corner of Northwest 60th Street and Ninth Avenue Northwest Jan. 21

Though the tree was on private property, it met the requirements for an exceptional monkey puzzle tree, with a diameter greater than 22 inches on a lot larger than 5,000 square feet.

Exceptional trees on private property can be removed, but only after a Department of Planning and Development-approved risk assessment.

Bryan Stevens, spokesperson for the Department of Planning and Development, said in addition to a fine, the notice of violation includes a reforestation agreement. The agreement is negotiable but aims for the planting of a tree with similar canopy cover, he said.

The removal of the tree, which some residents put at more than 60 years old, caused distress among a group of neighbors who said it was a neighborhood landmark.

We encourage our readers to comment. No registration is required. We ask that you keep your comments free of profanity and keep them civil. They are moderated and objectionable comments will be removed.

Comments

MP tree

This tree looks like it's right next to the house. If this is true, the owner should be let off the hook. It is windy sometimes. Trees don't remain standing forever.

MP Tree

It is funny that the department of planning can remove and destroy trees at their will, but if a home owner makes this decision they are fined. Take a look at the butcher job done along 32nd Ave NW- trees we hacked to please the city with no input from home owners.

Perhaps the city needs a class action lawsuit to remind them whom pays their check!

Man...gotta love Seattle. I

Man...gotta love Seattle. I pay tons of property tax on a 'high value' house I couldn't sell if I wanted to. Big chunks of that money pay for schools I won't let my kids attend. Then, you get fined for cutting down a messy and dangerous tree in your own yard? Guess the DPD didn't get their money for the permit and inspection.

Shame on you tree cutter!

What's the matter with you poeple? Stop the tree cutting in this city! Shame on Seattleites cutting down trees and ruining our green environment, Just because it is your property does not mean you can ruin a neighboorhood and do anything you want.

Shame on you... There are

Shame on you... There are pleanty of trees in this city. Who cares if one gets taken down? Go live in the woods!

Monkey Tree

I live next door to a lot in Ballard that once held a cabin built in 1910, the first home built on the block. The lot also contained 3 gorgeous mature cedars as well as an enormous oak tree at least 60 years old. When the lot was sold to a developer, the oak was nominated by neighbors as a heritage tree in hopes that it would be protected. However, the new owner got wind of the nomination and before filing for a permit to demolish the cabin, came in on a stormy November day and clear-cut the entire lot and fed everything into a chipper. And the best thing is that the city is aware of this loophole where an owner can cut down every living thing on a property BEFORE applying for a demo permit, thereby avoiding an environmental assessment of the property that might restrict such an action. To my knowledge this loophole still exists since it benefits developers and consequently benefits the city with development fees and taxes. Trees versus money? Guess which one loses...

Cutting this tree down is not

Cutting this tree down is not about the itself but about the right of the home owner to insure and maintain his or her own prperty! if the city wants to take over that respoibilty then BUY it