COMMENTARY: Cantwell says healthcare reform should increase access, bring down costs
The health care debate is heating up in Washington, DC and as a member of the state Senate Finance Committee, I’m working to help Washingtonians get the coverage they deserve, and ensure this care is of the highest quality at the lowest cost.
As a nation we spend too much on health care and get too little in return, leaving businesses and families with outrageous bills and eroding benefits, and our country with exploding deficits. We need to focus on fixing what's broken and building on what works.
I’ve long maintained that Washington State can serve as the model for improving health care nationwide. For years, we have been at the forefront of innovation, providing programs and services to bring costs down and improve quality of care.
Our state routinely ranks in the top quarter of the nation in healthy outcomes, and at the bottom end for wasteful spending. Rather than rewarding doctors, hospitals, and health care providers for the number of procedures they perform, Washington state rewards them for the healthy outcomes of their patients. This is exactly the type of approach we should take nationally.
Over the past few months, I have heard from thousands of Washingtonians and healthcare experts across our state on their concerns. Working closely with many Washingtonians, I introduced the Medical Efficiency and Delivery Improvement of Care (MEDIC) Act to address three specific areas of health care reform: reforming Medicare’s pay structure so that it rewards quality of care, not quantity of care, as in the current structure; developing long-term care services and programs to provide patients with options and alternatives to nursing homes; and increasing the number of practicing primary care doctors to ensure coordinated care for patients.
The MEDIC Act includes the following proposals:
Medicare payment improvement
For years our state has been penalized under Medicare for providing some of the highest quality care in the nation for lower costs. While providers could make more money in other states, those in Washington are often forced to decide between taking on new patients and staying in business because of this unfair reimbursement structure.
My plan would provide incentives when providers administer low-cost, high-quality care, and pair it with a new physician payment component that rewards quality, not quantity, of services. Washington already ranks 16th out of all 50 states and the District of Columbia in keeping costs per Medicare beneficiary low, with an average of $7, 110 statewide instead of New Jersey’s $9, 551 and Florida’s $9, 379. If everyone spent per beneficiary what we spend, the country could save over $50 billion a year.
Preserving patient access to primary care
If patients don’t have access to quality doctors, no health insurance plan is going to be enough. Experts estimate that by 2020 we will need 40 percent more practicing primary care physicians to meet patient demand. My plan adopts long overdue reforms to improve pay levels for primary care providers who provide integrated care coordination. It also ensures an adequate primary care workforce, especially in rural areas.
Data shows that patients in integrated care systems with primary care physicians have improved health outcomes, reduced mortality rates, lower utilization of health care resources, and lower overall costs for their care.
Physician workforce enhancement
All the delivery and cost reforms in the world won’t solve our problems if we don’t have more doctors working in the fields where people need them most - family medicine, preventative medicine, pediatrics, and behavioral and mental health. My proposal would help increase the quantity of physicians trained in these specialties, and expand graduate medical education programs to more suburban and rural hospitals.
Delivering home and community-based services
Current law prevents people from accessing long-term care information and services until they have depleted their entire life savings and become poor enough to qualify for Medicaid. By then, it is often too late to provide cost-effective home care, and people end up being forced into nursing homes too soon. My proposal would help people stay in their own homes longer, and avoid using Medicaid, with healthier results for patients.
Home and community balancing
Most seniors and people with disabilities prefer access to home and community based long-term care over moving to a nursing home. Because home and community based care cost almost 70 percent less than a nursing home, and long-term care already makes up 30 percent of all costs to the Medicaid program, my plan would help states offer home and community based long-term care by offering a federal Medicaid matching rate to states that implement programs promoting home and community-based services, keeping seniors in their homes and providing them with access to high-quality, individualized care.
I believe that with the MEDIC Act, we can achieve our goals of improving the health care workforce, stabilizing the physician payment structure, improving access to care, and decreasing the financial and emotional burdens associated with long-term care while simultaneously providing significant savings throughout the health care system.
My goal is to make these key initiatives an integral part of the larger health care reform effort, aimed at providing access to all, preserving and expanding quality of service, and curbing the exploding growth of health care costs.
Sen. Maria Cantwell is a member of the Washington State Senate Finance Committee.
We encourage our readers to comment. No registration is required. We ask that you keep your comments free of profanity and keep them civil. They are moderated and objectionable comments will be removed.

Comments
a strong public option is mandatory for any health care reform
Upon reading Senator Cantwell's comments on her MEDIC Act proposal, I immediately called her Washington, D.C. office to respond with the following observations.
Almost three-quarters of the American people want to see some form of public option choice in whatever health care reform legislation is put before President Obama to sign. That includes 87% of Democrats and at least half of Republicans.
Secondly, there are only two industries who are exempt from anti-trust monopoly regulation in this country. One is major league baseball. The other, and this is the kicker, is the insurance industry which was given that exemption in 1945.
While I am not exactly an economist, I cannot fail to understand that perhaps a major component of the U.S. government's inability to control medical costs has as its core reason the fact that this industry does not *have to* abide by the same laws and restrictions that govern nearly every other economic activity in our country.
If Senator Cantwell's true intention is to broaden access the affordable health care and to lower costs, it seems to me that the two most obvious ways to bring this about are to repeal the insurance industry from anti-trust regulation and to provide a strong public option choice when it comes to medical insurance providers.
To Senator Cantwell's credit, my research shows that she has taken no money from the health insurance industry. Whatever hesitation she shows to committing to a public option choice must come from conviction and principle. We prevail upon Senator Cantwell's strong desire to improve her constituents lives that the best way she could do so would be to commit to single-payer health care. Absent that, we need a strong public option choice for those of us who no longer with to do business with an unregulated, monopoly industry like the insurance industry.
mickey
A sIngle-payer plan is the only acceptable option and the majority of America's citizens know it. Allowing insurance companies to make a profit from the suffering of others is obscene. But Senator Cantwell, like all the spineless Democrats, will not draw a line in the sand over single-payer, because she, like all of them, is too terrified of losing campaign contributions from Big Pharma and the Insurance Industry.
The "reform" that's being pushed by Obama and Congress deserves to fail.
Single Payer or nothing.
Washington voter
Big Pharma campaign contributions won't save her from being voted out - we're voting you out, Senator, if you don't work for us and get on board with single-payer.
Healthcare Reform and Nursing Homes
Today’s quality of care in nursing homes is measurable to the Holocaust.
BEWARE:
My mother suffered and was killed by Sun Healthcare Group Inc’s Sunbridge nursing home in Newport Beach, Calif where they refused to repair/replace known broken equipment while under a Calif state injunction for having killed patients in Burlingame, Calif years earlier. The Dept of Justice turned a blind eye. The Dept of Health didn’t fine the usual $100,000 for her death. But their own medical director, Dr Stoney, wrote an opinion SUN killed her and he’d quit due to their disregard to his pleas and other families’ pleas for help.
They produce profits at the at the cost of elder abuse and manslaughter.
And the reason SUN can’t sue me for telling the truth is SUN didn’t pay me to sign a confidentialty agreement because I’d left mediation when my attorney threatened me with bodily harm for their CEO. I sued him Daniel Leipold, Santa Ana, California, for malpractice and he died 2 weeks later. Do you think he was working for Sun Heatlhcare?
Deborah Calvert daughter of the late Evelyn Calvert, Newport Beach, California
Sunbridge nursing home
Thanks for the warning about Sun Healthcare's nursing homes. They are all over the country. It sounds as though they are connected to the government somehow. That is pretty scarey to think they'll do this to others.We need to get the word out this is corruption, isn't it?
Gary Fischer, St. Louis, MO