Michael Harthorne
People hang out at Bergen Place Park on a recent sunny afternoon.

21st Century Viking: The homeless in Bergen Place aren’t the problem

In this week’s edition of the News-Tribune, there was an article about the increasing number of homeless people hanging out at Bergen Place Park. Ballard was chosen by the city to be an area that was going to become more densely populated. Ballard is a neighborhood in the middle of a large American city.

You can’t expect an urban neighborhood to become more densely populated and assume that none of the problems that plague cities are going to come up. The real issue here is how the people of Ballard approach and deal with the homeless that are in our midst.

There are many who want to help homeless people in some way and there are those who don’t want to help at all because it encourages them. Regardless of how you feel on this issue, there is one thing that truly bothers me and that is people who are upset by their mere presence.

If Ballard is supposedly so tolerant, why is everyone so upset by the sight of people who have nowhere else to go hanging out in a public area?

While there are homeless people who act like complete jerks and are messing up Bergen Place (and many other parks everywhere), there are also those who try to be respectful of others as they struggle to survive. The same could be said of people with jobs and a place to live who walk their dogs in the same parks and don’t pick up after them or people who don’t throw away their garbage or cigarette butts.

For too long, Ballard has refused to deal with the possibility that there could be a downside to all of this densification. It is unrealistic to expect that hard problems like this will not come up. The next question is how much of this are you going to take?

If you are too nice, then you run the risk of having homeless people flock to Ballard. But where are they going to go? Wherever you move in Seattle, there will always be another park. There are a lot of people who used to live in Ballard because it was affordable, but there are some who aren’t going to be forced to leave no matter high the rents or housing prices get.

There are no easy answers to these really tough questions. The issue of homeless people in Ballard isn’t going to magically go away even if the economy improves overnight.

No matter how good or bad things get, there will always be people who, for a myriad of reasons will be homeless. It is not as pretty and glamorous as a brand new condo building, but it is just as much a fact of life of living in Ballard.

There presence makes some people visibly uncomfortable. They would rather not see these people living their lives out in full view of everyone else. But don’t they have the right to sit on a bench in a public place? They pay their sales taxes, too. Is there someplace out of sight that you would recommend that would make you more comfortable?

I wish I had the answers to these questions. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to homelessness. Each person is unique. For every one incorrigible junkie or alcoholic, there is another person who wants to change their situation. There are many ways to help. Pick one. Just don’t tell me you don’t want them there because they have as much right to hang out at the park as you.

Questions, comments, column idea? Please contact Brian Le Blanc at brianleblanc76@yahoo.com or publish a comment.

We encourage our readers to comment. No registration is required. We ask that you keep your comments free of profanity and keep them civil. They are moderated and objectionable comments will be removed.

Comments

“People who are homeless

“People who are homeless are not social inadequates. They are people without homes.”

typo

3rd paragraph, 3rd to the last word. 'there' should be 'their' and you should be proofreading.

Mr. LeBlanc makes a good

Mr. LeBlanc makes a good point about the intolerant among us who simply wish to rid the city of homeless - period. Theirs is an untenable position, which overlooks the importance of diversity in a vital community.

However, if it became clear that homelessness, itself, is not the problem and that the criminal among them is really what most of us object to, then perhaps we might be more united and effective in the fight to clean up our community. The inability of many to make this distinction is to blame for our inaction. We residents and business owners on Ballard Avenue have found that even the police hold this faulty view. Their blanket statement is that the city has a lenient homeless policy that prevents police action.

Well, the police are confused - and so is anyone who thinks of homelessness as a crime.

What is most visible in the parks and on the streets is crime by late stage alcoholics and crack and meth users - all people who follow the path of least resistance by taking advantage of our inaction in policing our neighborhood.

People! It is OK to dislike crime and donate to food banks and shelters at the same time. There is no contradiction in that. It is also OK to bring as much law down on the criminal as is humanly possible. Though many of the crimes such as public urination and defecation, drinking on the streets, prostitution, camping in the parks etc. are minor offenses, they still contribute to social disorder. If you consider the hard drug use we now have, you have the recipe for serious crime.

Yes, if we succeed in pushing the crime out of our neighborhood, it will relocate (a favorite excuse used by the police). It should be pursued and prosecuted wherever it goes.

If we are to have a vital community, which Ballard is becoming, we can help the truly homeless and rid our streets of the ugliness we all seem to object to.

I strongly urge you all to get involved, attend public meetings, contact the police if there is trouble, check out Tim Burgess' website for his Safe Streets Initiative, Attend City Council hearings on the inevitable budget cuts that will almost certainly affect public services, and USE THE PARKS! Don't leave them for the drunks and the crackheads.

Typo

And pointing out the typo is all you have to say about the article?

Perhaps you should go into editing. Then you could at least get paid to nit-pick instead of doing it during your free time.